Alkis Evlogimenos
Alkis Evlogimenos
> Doesn't this require a vote before merging? Started one here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/x3472kldrq5kjnld9ztj1jozz25f40hg
> It seems that license header should be added before merging. Added.
@wgtmac are we merging this?
> I want to make sure @pitrou is happy with the change. He had one [suggestion](https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/254/commits/4e8672e148c1054b913fc9b5e4c188b56978e51c) which I accepted.
# Option 4: `carpenter` The data in `parquet-testing` are a collection of `PLAIN_ENCODED` uncompressed parquet files and the `carpenter` binary. The `carpenter` is responsible for invoking drivers from different implementations...
> Need to host all important implementations under a single CI job (including closed-source ones? including GPU ones?). This is a good point. Does it apply to all options? If...
Rust folks ended up adding `partition_point`. It can emulate `lower_bound` and `upper_bound`. It probably can't match the performance for `equal_range` though.