Ali Ok

Another improvement here: - Let's remove the "interested parties" role in the WG charter docs - This is a legacy role, used when the WG was forming up

good idea @Riaankl ! Thanks for finding this old ticket. This one has a better scope actually.

Can we define the concrete ask here? I want to see more description in `help wanted` tasks.

Related: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/issues/546 This task is about creating the documentation, https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/issues/546 is about helping projects apply the advisory from the to-be-created document.

This is not really governance, but that's the closest one. I want to discuss what this is in a TAG meeting and there's no separate infra meeting.

~~This is currently blocked on finishing the governance review template first: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/pull/479~~

Notes from a recent meeting about how to proceed with this work: - Some content that can be in the guide is available in this [PR](https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/pull/483#discussion_r1290756135) - Need to make...

We're working on this matter in a feature branch: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/tree/governance-self-assessment-guide Let's keep this ticket open until we thing we're done and merge the content to main.

Istio might be a good candidate to ask for trying our self assessment guide+template when we're done. Related: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/issues/414

This work will be on hold until there's a decision about "projects moving levels (TODO: link)" is done and approved by the TOC. However, let's create a new task for...