Aleksandr Bezobchuk

Nice! Yeah a PDF on this would be dope. I like the idea!

I would be happy to help with any integrations. Perhaps I could open up a PR to support OpsGenie as a reference?

ACK, yeah this totally makes sense and TBH was an oversight on my part. I didn't realize how much time these calls took.

@ValarDragon the SDK context type? I think that might be our only option. Alternatively, we have a global variable in the telemetry package.

> can we do what Tendermint does and pass a noop telemetry? or this is about also avoiding time calls? Yes > Also avoiding the time.Now() calls. Yes

I'm not really sure what @marbar3778 is referring to, but you can't really avoid defer timing calls. The idea is that we have a config in the config struct and...

I think my proposal achieves that whilst also being flexible to other things besides time measurements (e.g. counters)

> > How is this different from `sign-batch`? > > Oh seems like it is. @gsk967 can we merge this solution with sign-batch to accept multiple tx files. How does...

How would that work? Say we have a new flag, e.g. `multi-msg-file=`. Would this require the tx to be not signed and be appended to the file ``? What changes...

Makes sense. But I would have all txs use the new flag so make the UX easier. If the flag is present and the file is empty, then just populate...