Alan Cruickshank

This is definitely possible, and would also open up the option of specifying ignore options in the `.sqlfluff` file too. By setting up one we would do almost all of...

Thanks for the clear examples, I've seen this before described as "river" indentation. There are a couple of things in here that you're suggesting: 1. `Hanging indents`: specifically here where...

@barrywhart - Thanks for the first review. I think the only tricky points are: 1. Sometimes there being an opportunity to _remove_ newlines and condense expressions onto fewer lines. I'm...

Apart from keeping this up to date with master - this PR is ready to go. I'm not going to merge it yet because that starts the clock ticking for...

Hmmmmmm _interesting_. I've confirmed this bug with this PR: #5449 . Looking at the annotations (here: https://github.com/sqlfluff/sqlfluff/pull/5449/files#annotation_16095232428), only the first 10 _exactly_ are shown in the native process, but all...

Ok - frustratingly, this appears to be a GitHub limitation rather than a SQLFluff one. On digging around the internet, I've found numerous people complaining about this: - https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/26680 -...

I'm going to close this issue as stale. I think it's been addressed.

I suspect that this may have been resolved as part of the 2.0.0 release. Is anyone able to test with either 2.0.0 or 2.0.1 to see if the problem still...

I'm going to close this issue as resolved. Testing on 2.3.4 with this query results in no linting issues: ```jinja {% macro a_useful_macro(input) -%} some_function({{ input }}) {%- endmacro %}...

@cpendery - there's been significant performance work over the last few months. While there's probably still some headroom, I'm going to propose that we close this issue for now. Large...