Anthony Towns
Anthony Towns
To test, start with `-datacarriersize=10`, and run ``` send '{"data": "4368616e63656c6c6f72206f6e206272696e6b206f66207365636f6e64206261696c6f757420666f722062616e6b73"}' null "unset" 1 ``` from the console. "Non-mempool: " should appear in the Balances pane on the Overview window...
Screenshot: The negative sign for the non-memool stuff isn't really very clear, perhaps.
Updated with post-history in metadata and some rationale
Time to request a bip number then I guess?
I think this is fine to merge as draft, further review/changes can happen in that state as I understand it.
> I may have overlooked it, but at first glance it looks like the draft is missing important specification on how to implement the goals set forth in the Motivation...
Could the editors please clarify which of these concerns are blockers for merging this BIP in "Draft" status?
> that this document should be enhanced in the future with further discussion of privacy implications. That's what the "TBA" in the otherwise empty recommendations section is for (as well...
> Could the editors please clarify which of these concerns are blockers for merging this BIP in "Draft" status? I've been told some editors are privately blocking merge of this...
This is now published as [BIN25-2](https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/binana/blob/master/2025/BIN-2025-0002.md) so I'll be using that repo to refine the document while it's in draft.