Ignas Anikevicius
Ignas Anikevicius
Yeah, most likely, but I haven't done a deep dive about it yet.
I think I must be confused as to what is the ruleset that should be used for protobuf python library - is it not the py_proto_library from the protobuff repo...
I guess then it means that we'll just continue having the api as is and we leave the removal for 2.0. On 3 September 2024 07:45:50 GMT+09:00, Alex Eagle ***@***.***>...
#1933 was the first time I heard of desire to do something like this.
I wonder what is the functional difference between what we have and what is in https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/cf688f339c80dc372a34302de6dae3d749ec8e72/bazel/py_proto_library.bzl#L132
Related slack discussion: https://bazelbuild.slack.com/archives/CKU1D04RM/p1732581509956829
Created #2560 to illustrate what API I am thinking of.
* @mark-thm, rules_python can still provide the list of all available packages. If it provided a single py_library that includes everything, then you could traverse the transitive dependencies and get...
@fmeum, could you please take a look at this fix?
Will this be backported to `7.3.2` or an upcoming `7.4` release? Trying to understand about what kind of helpers/wrappers we need to maintain within `rules_python`, so that we can more...