Anton Driesse
Anton Driesse
I am neutral on including this. Could this be made trustworthy? You would certainly need more than one sample file to test on. From my experience with reading and writing...
> During the bi-monthly core team meeting on 2025-12-10 Am I still on the mailing list?
It occurs to me that this is a fast-moving target, so we'll probably have to modify the approach in the near future regardless.
I think I lean towards @AdamRJensen 's suggestion, which maintains the default behaviour for now.
> Clearly AOI >90 means that the surface is not illuminated so, but to prevent any undesirable situation maybe I could force smm to be 1 in case of not...
Well, here we have to implement what was published, but I would say as AOI approaches 90, the irradiance is mostly diffuse, so probably the best SMM value to use...
Before we jump to a conclusion @jesuspolo can you provide some information about how points with AOI>90 were treated in your model development and validation?
> The model was developed using only SMM values computed for AOI lower than 90 Ok, I think this information should be included in the docstring somewhere. The docstring should...
Thinking about this again, it seems unlikely that floating PV will be built on the type of water body modeled here, so are we encouraging the possible misuse for other...
> > Thinking about this again, it seems unlikely that floating PV will be built on the type of water body modeled here, so are we encouraging the possible misuse...