acolytec3
acolytec3
> Gm, Is this pr suitable for Bedrock testing? I will update the configuration for the mainnet ofc I think it's worth trying. I know @holgerd77 tested it with a...
> Took a stab at this following the model of the Ultralight provider. > > Biggest question has to do with `getAccount` - and what the equivalent `ethers` call is....
I just realized my original issue description wasn't exactly correct be there is no `getAccount` in the rpc. It's really just `getBalance`. You might also have to implement a wrapper...
> > > There isn't a 1-1 equivalent there. You would use it inside of `ethers.provider.getBalance` if the main one I can think of. > > So i should include...
You should benchmark the differences in [this](https://github.com/ethereumjs/ethereumjs-monorepo/blob/5400f22edaa5f992cc4c9c3083f3de9e7693fddc/packages/client/src/sync/fetcher/accountfetcher.ts#L230) instantation of the trie using `leveldb` versus just removing that leveldb from the trie constructor (which would then default to using the `MapDB`...
Okay, so here's some benchmarking for mapdb vs leveldb. Here's my benchmarking script: ```ts import { Trie } from '@ethereumjs/trie' import { randomBytes } from 'crypto' //@ts-ignore import * as...
Yup, this is a known issue. I've done some experimentation with compiling c-kzg to wasm with limited success so far (mainly due to my own inexperience with modern C++ and...
You can definitely remove the peerId stuff. That's all just sitting there in case we want to revive devp2p over libp2p and isn't actually ever compiled or run. I think...
> > > > correct, thats the discv5 functionality CL use, wondering if geth also uses same/similar Do we want to add discv5 discovery to our EL client? Wouldn't be...