Anthony Blaom, PhD
Anthony Blaom, PhD
cc @pazzo83
No, I now think that the MLJBase PR is (by accident?) actually avoiding this issue. See https://github.com/JuliaAI/MLJBase.jl/pull/731#issuecomment-1021891466 . Still this issue could turn up unexpectedly elsewhere.
@OkonSamuel Thanks for that explantation. It's good we are tracking this kind of issue. It sounds like we might want to wait for the cited issues to be resolved before...
Or are you saying we could safely implement the workaround (under the hood - the user doesn't need to do anything)?
No, no, that's sound like a reasonable suggestion, especially if you are happy to make the PR's 😄 There could be some tedium around updating the tests, which presently cycle...
@davibarreira Thanks for chiming in here. Be good to know what dependencies in ScientificTypes you don't need in your use case. Please check those you don't need. - [ ]...
I've installed femtocleaner and configured to track one repo. None of the three "triggers" appear to have any immediate effect. It has been over 14 hours since I did the...
Specifically: ```julia ST.scitype(::Tuple{Any,MT}) where MT
@mateuszbaran @kellertuer I propose you add MLJScientificTypes to your dev project and pin to the [manifolds](https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJScientificTypes.jl/tree/manifolds) branch until we're sure this is the best approach. Yes?
@mateuszbaran @kellertuer Been a while. Here's an update from our end: The `manifold` branch referred to above is now part of an archived repo - a casualty of the renaming...