Anthony Blaom, PhD

Results 815 comments of Anthony Blaom, PhD

> Of course I guess there is the possibility of adding a hyperparameter to the composite model that can be transferred after to the machine definitions. This would probably solve...

The problem with this, of course, is that measures should ideally be conceptualised as independent of MLJ altogether, and machines are an MLJ concept.

I've created a test PR referenced above of [for-a-0-point-20-release](https://github.com/JuliaAI/MLJBase.jl/tree/for-a-0-point-20-release) onto `dev` which hopefully will reproduce the fail.

Ah-haaa! Yes that makes sense. @olivierlabayle Thanks for taking time to diagnose this problem. This is an interesting case I had never thought of: data being stored in partial functions....

Didn't know about this feature, thanks. That's a pattern I've wondered about. Guess it has to wrapped in a block to test the feature actually exists, as it is still...

Agreed. Waiting for: - [ ] resolution of https://github.com/JuliaData/Tables.jl/issues/281

I think it's a good idea and reasonable request. Another possibility would be to use https://github.com/JuliaML/MLDataPattern.jl instead.

I am not able to reproduce but did have a different issue that was resolved with ```julia import Conda Conda.update() ``` You may have to add `Conda` to your environment....

> it relies on a dataset that we can't serve. Oh well. A link would be good.