Anthony Blaom, PhD

Thanks @olivierlabayle for looking into yet another interesting area for enhancement. It's exciting to hear you may be interested in helping out here! Re the multithreading. Thanks for this POC!...

BTW, if you are interested in pushing the POC a little further, you could already do some testing to check multithreaded stacks and CPU1 stacks give the same answers (assuming...

@jpsamaroo Thanks for the quick response and update. Things look promising. I suggest that if and when @olivierlabayle is ready to look at the distributed case, we have all have...

For the record, here is the original, open (but quite stale) issue for adding distributed computing via Dagger: https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl/issues/72

Should wait until I finish some refactoring on machines. **Edit** Done.

@olivierlabayle I'd like to acknowledge this proposal which I haven't reviewed yet. It sounds interesting, but it may take me a couple weeks to look properly at it. You have...

@olivierlabayle Thanks for looking into this and for your patience. I have now reviewed this PR in some detail. I have to say I *really* like the idea in this...

> By the way, I have tried to run the Stack with an EnsembleModel and it seems to run just fine unless I missed anything. No I mean the other...

> If someone wants to use the learning network API they will have to use the machine interface anyway and depend on MLJBase. I think you mean that if a...

@olivierlabayle I'm sorry, but after sitting on this a few days, I'm still reluctant to provide, in MLJBase.jl, a facility that encourages composite model definitions that do not meet the...