Alberto Arana

About the RFC #8051, I have a doubt about _[React considerations](https://github.com/visgl/deck.gl/blob/0261cd22c25a452fca2edb52b2e9543202f815b8/dev-docs/RFCs/v8.0/carto-v9-rfc.md#mvt-vs-binary-data-format)_. Now the access_token is required into new source functions, so the access_token need to add as dependency in `useMemo`,...

> > Now the access_token is required into new source functions, so the access_token need to add as dependency in `useMemo`, I would like to see how the workflow is...

> @aaranadev we've come up with a pattern which avoids the need for using `useMemo`: #8214 Oh great! I see the REQUEST_CACHE map being replaced

Hello @surruka, the current version `1.x` isn't compatible with React 18, because [email protected] doesn't support it. But the next version `2.x` (currently in beta) of @carto/react-x uses mui@5 which is...

I propose that if the solution is to create a separate component for the comparative mode to avoid breaking changes, it's possible to create new widgets with models for a...

I guess C4R exports a props interface to change the texts, so the responsibility is derived from the app and the multi-language is out. An example: ```js `${data.length ? data.length...

Hi @VictorVelarde , thx for the answer. With my POC, I've been able to check the technical questions and _State_ and _deck.gl_ are working ok. About UX/UI, I think that...

Great! I think that the (a): SINGLE MASK, all agree, but I don't understand > and explicitly excluding here drawing holes Can you explain me? On another side (b) MULTIPLE...

@felixpalmer @VictorVelarde, I've uploaded the code to public repo. https://github.com/aaranadev/c4r-compare-mode You can see the code and test it. When `npm install` is done, you need to remove the error of...

Yes, it's the same code that C4R has but changing an array of one element by n elements