Mauryan Kansara
Mauryan Kansara
GitHub, generate site ^^^ ignore this
> @Zopsss , please restore activity in this PR. Hey @romani sorry for the late reply, I've pushed new changes 3 days ago and replied to your review comments. Will...
referring to: https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/15458#issuecomment-2282281012 ``` /** * Some Javadoc. * * Some sontent. * * Some content. */ // violation 2 lines above 'P tag or block-level HTML elements should start...
@romani From example given in issue description: > \* `` > \* `` // should give violation: extra P tag. One more possible: after P should be no space **"One...
https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/15680 PR sent @romani
I was trying to solve this issue locally, I found some bugs in [JavadocParagraph](https://checkstyle.org/checks/javadoc/javadocparagraph.html) which I would like to report before proceeding further. ```xml ``` ```java /** * Some summary....
Issue opened: https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/15685 @romani
> such comments should be just removed. I think these comments should stay as they're explaining the check's behavior. Can we just convert them to block comments instead, as you...
Ohh, I see. If that's the case then it is okay to remove them 👍🏻
> @Zopsss , please make PR with Input that shows shows long identifiers wrapped by formatter as he can AND how checkstyle violate them. > > Long variable, method, type...