Peter Hill
Peter Hill
Ah, I see what you mean. I think that could in principle be handled by [`configurations`](https://cps-org.github.io/cps/configurations.html), but that's maybe not so ideal. I think this is supposed to be handled...
We have this in BOUT++: https://github.com/boutproject/BOUT-dev/blob/master/.github/workflows/clang-format.yml There is a small downside: running this in PRs can hide test failures, which is a bit annoying. The other options are to run...
Looks like the error is actually coming from Github when we ask for the diff of the PR -- that is, we don't care how big the PR is, but...
I think there's basically two parts to getting this working: 1. Creating a set of Sphinx classes for rendering the docs - This would let users manually write docs in...
@jalvesz @clatim if you're still interested in this, please get in touch and we'll set up a call about how best to go about this :)
Awesome!
I think this should be possible, but we'd need to look up the bound procedure to see if it has `pass`/`nopass` on it.
I have a practically identical change in #159 for very similar reasons :)
Launching them with `solver:nout=1 solver:timestep=1` will do the minimal thing that hits all parts
Does this now include #399? Is that on purpose?