Motov Yurii

@gshmu, sorry, but I didn't get it.. Could you please elaborate on why you think the proposed way is more convenient? For me it will bring additional cognitive load for...

> why don't you check my PR? We need one more review from Persian native speaker to get this merged

> its ok well done You need to use GitHub review mechanism: "Files changed" -> "Review changes"

> Done @YuriiMotov We need 2 approvals 

I think we don't need these changes. For now these tests will run twice (with Pydantic V1 and with Pydantic V2). When Pydantic V1 is used, the result will either...

> If we’re already putting the code demo and installation guide together in the same section, why not arrange them in a way that’s more ergonomic and user-friendly? I understand...

I just noticed that this page has already been translated. @amin-abbasiy and others, do you think new translation is better than existing?

@thomas-touhey, thanks for your interest in FastAPI! There were several similar PRs and they were closed due to weak reasoning. You already provided a use case, but maybe we can...

Should we even care about this? * As I understand this only happens if (any of): * people use AD blockers. They can always add `tiangolo.com` to exceptions and look...

`validation_error_response_definition` seems to be correct at the moment, but `validation_error_response_definition` should be updated by adding the absent `input` and `ctx` fields. Related discussion with the code example to showcase the...