Xuanwo
> if modify Access::info() to return Arc, a lot of struct will need a extra field to store the info, is that right? We can start by simply adding an...
> some layers need a mutable `AccessorInfo`, so `Arc` may not work Those layers can build a new `AccessorInfo` with changed value.
Has been implemented, closing.
合并
We haven't released the binary packages due to historical reasons, but we're actively working on it! Check out https://github.com/apache/opendal/discussions/4126 and https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/4134 for more details. I'm hopeful that we'll be able...
Should be done in next release.
Every binary has been released seperately now!
> Just changing `u64` in `api.rs` for all offset to `usize` followed by changes in all implementations should be fine, right? I don't have plan to change it yet. Please...
> I think if the underlying client uses `usize` then it could be an issue if the offset provided is pretty large. Your understanding is correct. However, the proper solution...
> @Xuanwo about opendal found a memory leak in the check, I am also not sure need to fix, so leave comment here Cool, would you like to raise an...