Xuanwo
Hi @suyanhanx, are you still interested in implementing this issue?
> Yes. Any additional info? We can implement the support for s3 first and design some behavior test.
The current design does not account for `list`, `delete`, and `undelete`. I feel we need to refine the RFC before continuing with the work.
> `Add version(bool) in List to include version during list or not`, why not use `MetaKey::Version ` ? Wow, nice question. The `Metakey` is designed for querying metadata in a...
> If versioning is enabled, should we return `version id` after writing an object ? If not, we would need to call `stat` or `list` to retrieve it. Yep, it's...
> I'd love to do it! :) But I want to finish this RFC first. In the `versioning` tests, I'll temporarily use `stat` to retrieve the `version id`. Thanks a...
Hi, @meteorgan, are you willing to update this issue's progress?
I have a new proposal in https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1254
Hi, @Lzzzzzt. Thanks for joining the discussion and starting https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/4883. After some consideration, I think it would be better to modify `Access::info()` to return `Arc`, similiar to what you suggested...
> It seems need to change a lot, if modify `Access::info()` to return `Arc` Yes. If we do need API breaking changes, I prefer change `opendal::raw` API instead of `opendal`'s...