Westbrook Johnson
Westbrook Johnson
This is outcomes, I'm wondering what you think about an actual alteration of the API to support something like this. In that way, these questions come to mind: - is...
Does this process still benefit from https://angular.io/api/core/CUSTOM_ELEMENTS_SCHEMA? Would you be able to share more info about what it means to be "compatible with Angular Ivy."?
We be happy to take a look at one. We'd likely not be able to make a release with this feature until all of our Form Elements supported it to...
Some off the cuff thought: - have you tried this with the `virtualize` directive rather than a virtualiser element? - Likely this runs afoul of the connected/disconnected logic in ``...
Spectrum design specifically excludes this option from their specification. It's unclear whether this would be something that they would accept as an addition to the specification.
Possibly of interest: https://github.com/webcomponents/polyfills/issues/568
Would be great if you opened a issue with your goals here so we can ensure that the path you take to solve them set you and your application us...
Can we close this in favor of #4200?
There's a decent amount of nastiness around making this something that is possible with the current API of this element. Could you share some of your goal in taking this...
@pfulton can you cycle with design on this and see if we should update the CSS docs to only include `invalid` Tags _with_ this icon?