Brian Ward

Exposing these should be easy if you can provide the list of supported signatures

More forum requests: https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/how-to-use-stan-hypergeometric-2f1-in-stan/33840

There is still the ambiguity issue in `for (i in 1:n)` that makes this unable to be implemented in current Stan without either a differentiating syntax or a breaking change...

Right now 1:n is a range, and you can modify n inside the loop, modifying the range. Treating it as an array changes the semantics when n is modified inside...

The issue is that it has been allowed for years (possibly since the beginning)? It’s not necessarily documented or encouraged behavior, of course, since it’s better to use a while...

This shaves ~20-30 minutes off of the CI compared to what we do right now. If we don't actually care about code-generating or linking of the stanc-generated code, it seems...

> Isn't there sub slicing when we peel off `_lpdf` suffixes in sampling statements? 1. Not quite, since we generally go _from_ something without a suffix (`Y ~ foo(...)`) to...

This would be a bit tricky to implement I think. What use case do you have in mind?

I know this issue is old at this point, but in the binary compiler we add `_model` to the name of the file, but not in the JS compiler. Is...

With #1353 this may be obsolete by the next release but I don't see any harm in marking it supported if it is