VictorECDSA

> Yes @fenghaoming, you're right! > > The purpose of executing pending transactions in the pool is to exclude invalid transactions after the state change caused by importing a new...

> This is a thorough analysis! > > I agree with the first conclusion but have some doubt about the second scenario. > > The balance check should deduct the...

> Let me clarify it a bit - my point was that we should not remove transaction execution, but simplify it instead. > > When a new block is imported,...

> Yes, your example is absolutely correct. The proposal is an optimistic approach and may falsely reject a transaction even if the sender has enough balance to cover the **actual...

> We can simply sort the transactions based on the gasPrice and limit the number of transactions that are actively evluated for pending block. So the complexity can be limited...

> @fenghaoming take a look at devnet: > https://github.com/semuxproject/semux-core/blob/master/docs/Devnet.md > > You can import private key and run your local private chain with 1 validator Thank you for your answer!...

> For a totally new chain, you need to generate a new genesis block, and you will need seed nodes so your new peers can find each other. Thank you...

> There's a utility to generate one in the code > > You cannot run multiple nodes on one box. What would be point? If you want one node/box run...

> As already stated, for a new mainnet, you cannot run multiple nodes on one box, regardless how you set up ports. > > You could fork and remove such...

> No longer supported for eth new forks. Which also, afaik, semux is not supporting or planning to support. > > I suppose we will evaluate new eth forked opcode's...