William Zijie Zhang
William Zijie Zhang
Hello @jajhall thanks for raising this issue! This seems like an important new feature and I will try to work on it in the upcoming weeks. I had two questions...
Hello @jajhall I have made some progress on this issue in the referenced PR above (#2573). We are just missing the implementation for the ``solve_via_data`` method in the highs interface...
Closing this issue as PR mentioned above has been merged to master. @jajhall thank you for raising this issue. CVXPY plans to release version 1.6. in the next couple of...
hmm CI failure is due to SCIP.. i'll investigate. But yea I think we should stick with double quotes.
> @Transurgeon Thanks for the quick review. Would you prefer: > > 1. Bumping the `numpy` version in `pyproject.toml` to `>=1.26` [Release notes](https://numpy.org/devdocs/release/1.26.0-notes.html) , or > 2. Tabling this change...
> Before we do the shim, let me see if we have consensus to move to NumPy 2.0. > > @SteveDiamond @Transurgeon shall we merge this PR bumping our dependencies...
Okay I think we should merge this! Thanks again for your help and patience @7astro7 !
> Perhaps yes. The issue appears to be that the solver is receiving badly formatted data (likely one of `A` or `P`). That's either because it is the wrong size...
@ischurov thanks for raising this issue and sorry for the long reply. I think you should specify a solver that supports the warm_start option. When you do ``prob.solve(warm_start=True)`` it uses...
we should update the documentation to use a solver that supports warm-starting.