Vasek - Tom C
Vasek - Tom C
@wingyplus It seems there's not conflict, please regenerate the dagger.gen.go client and then I can review :D
@helderco @jedevc @vito Is it still a relevant issue?
@helderco I'm pretty sure it's doable from the CLI, but the `sdk` field could also be a URL so we would need to be generic on the helpers. Like ```...
@sipsma @vito @jedevc I think this one is for one of you ;)
> @TomChv Does this fix seem sensible to you? [`d785be1` (#9327)](https://github.com/dagger/dagger/pull/9327/commits/d785be1ef0b2f1b7c185c8909045e3e07e05bfe1) > > The issue was that we had tests that define their own `Status` as an enum type. Go...
> Regarding the Analyzers/Codefixes - They are also entirely optional and can be completely disabled, my idea behind adding them was to add some 'rails' or quick fixes. Though they...
@idlsoft Hey! What is the difference between your proposal and the generated client feature? #9582 ``` go mod init example.com dagger init # No SDK, this can be used outside...
> This serves a different purpose, and gives extra flexibility on how you write your module code. In your module you get to import dagger.io/dagger instead of module/internal/dagger, which then...