ken

> I think it links to another PR which refers to issue [#19085](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19085) and mailing list discussion https://lists.apache.org/thread/3s7b7dh0h9qcnn8x3lclxmw75okkqf37 . @lhotari I have read this mailing list before. It looks like...

@mattisonchao Thinks for your clear explanation, that is very helpful for me. Now I understand why the previous code is designed for obey the rule "a partition topic can not...

> @TakaHiR07 Thanks for the great analysis and fix. Would it be possible to make a fix to master branch too? Does the problem appear there too? Usually we target...

> @TakaHiR07 Please check this test failure: > > ``` > Error: Tests run: 155, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 53, Time elapsed: 853.185 s

> good jobs, I have a question: should maxBytesToReplicate use long type? rateLimiter.acquire(int) just support int value. Besides, Integer.max_value means 2GB throughput, it is enough for most situation.

> > good jobs, I have a question: should maxBytesToReplicate use long type? > > rateLimiter.acquire(int) just support int value. Besides, Integer.max_value means 2GB throughput, it is enough for most...