Spiker985
Spiker985
@wlwl2 Closed due to staleness. This file also needs quite a bit more work than just that link. If you wish to continue this PR, or believe this to be...
@mauricioszabo Is this still needed?
Closing as a _lot_ has gone on in this space, and this is wildly out of date now
> Oh also, would you mind looking at the editor build? Looks like this causes some specs to fail. At least I believe the spec is calling a module by...
> And last note of concern is the original docs say that the package needs to exist on `NPM`, although I'm not sure why. So lets hope the name change...
> (Also huge thanks to whoever bumped tree-sitter and all grammars.) Although maybe add the package renames to the changelog? (I could submit a pr for that if you want)...
> The rename from `language-rust-bundled` to `language-rust` causes problems because a package with that name already exists! [web.pulsar-edit.dev/packages/language-rust](https://web.pulsar-edit.dev/packages/language-rust) Then do we want to move the other direction, and push all...
@pulsar-edit/core Would some of you mind chiming in on this? (Ignore the branch conflict, I'll fix those later) Attempted to standardize the names for some of the language packages, `language-rust-bundled`...
Well, ironically that package GitHub is archived as of at least the 8th. But if I remember correctly from my reading, those grammars were made by hand Which, we would...
> So might not have much to add on this one. But personally I'd just suggest we find a way to name that package even if it doesn't fit our...