SpecFlow.VisualStudio icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
SpecFlow.VisualStudio copied to clipboard

Visual Studio extension of SpecFlow (extracted from the main SpecFlow repo)

Results 71 SpecFlow.VisualStudio issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

When we use _Scoped Bindings_, the VS editor displays as if the step definitions are not found or bound. Pressing F12 gives a popup `Multiple matching bindings found. Navigation to...

Bug
Difficulty: hard
Severity: medium

Currently, if I have step like this: > When I type 20 into the calculator Then the suggested step definition is: > [When(@"I type (.*) into the calculator")] > public...

Difficulty: medium
Feature-Request
Severity: low

Hi, Bindings are not working and I have the following exception when I enable SpecFlow tracing: ![binding_error](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3820705/27974330-8ce25096-632b-11e7-9ef7-1659756aa600.JPG) ``` [15:34:13.1540370] GherkinProcessingScheduler: Applying task 'Analyze Test.feature.cs (BindingFilesTracker)' on thread: 40 [15:34:13.1540370] BindingFilesTracker:...

Bug
Difficulty: hard
Severity: low

# **Overview** I would like the ability to register a plugin with the Visual Studio Integration for SpecFlow that would allow me to change the default behavior for step binding...

Difficulty: hard
Feature-Request
Severity: low

There is a logic pattern in the Visual Studio integration that lends itself to deadlocking Visual Studio. The [dispose](https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow.VisualStudio/blob/master/VsIntegration/LanguageService/IdleTaskProcessingQueue.cs#L152) method in IdleTaskProcessingQueue will block on background threads. When a Solution...

Difficulty: hard
Severity: medium

### SpecFlow Version: - [x] 2.2 - [ ] 2.1 - [ ] 2.0 - [ ] 1.9 ### Used Test Runner - [ ] SpecFlow+Runner - [ ] MSTest...

Difficulty: hard
Feature-Request
Severity: medium

Scenario Outline place holders not being replaced correctly when strings in examples. ### SpecFlow Version: - [ x] 2.3.2 - [ ] 2.2 - [ ] 2.1 - [ ]...

Bug
Difficulty: hard
Severity: medium

I think we should investigate the possibility of implementing a SpecFlow LSP server to ease IDE integration. Many IDE's (https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/implementors/tools/) have native support for LSP already which means less work...

Difficulty: hard
Feature-Request
Severity: low

### SpecFlow Version: - [X] 2.3 - [ ] 2.2 - [ ] 2.1 - [ ] 2.0 - [ ] 1.9 ### Used Test Runner - [ ] SpecFlow+Runner...

Bug
Difficulty: hard
Severity: low

### SpecFlow Version: - [x] 2.4 - [ ] 2.3 - [ ] 2.2 - [ ] 2.1 - [ ] 2.0 - [ ] 1.9 ### Used Test Runner...

Bug
Difficulty: medium
Severity: low
up-for-grabs