Robert Wlodarczyk

Related to #6349

Personally, I'd prefer to use the `json.dumps()` and `json.loads()` functionality built-in the Python json modules already. A lot easier. However, I do feel this feature needs to be added to...

There is a test case `test_swagger_ref_count_04` that I believe is erroneous. There is nothing in the Swagger spec that disallows nested definitions or definitions that refer back onto themselves.

Another reference: https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-codegen/issues/728

I believe I have a fix for both this issue and #57. I need to do some more testing on it as it changes a fundamental portion of the parser.

Well, scratch that. That local fix passed unit tests, but failed when running the tool. I'm going to try to address #57 and #62 with looking at #63.

+1 on this feature ask! Otherwise, we have to write one ourselves.

Fixed in #56 too.

@willfarrell Any update on reviewing these changes?

@willfarrell Would appreciate the review. :)