Shane Krueger

Yes, it is.

I've assigned the bounty to you, marking it as `in-progress`, based on our bounty program @macco3k .

```cs builder.ConfigureExecutionOptions(o => { o.UnhandledExceptionDelegate = e => { var serviceProvider = o.RequestServices!; var httpContext = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService().HttpContext; var request = new GraphQLRequest { Query = o.Query, // for APQ support...

Sorry no dedicated extension method for that yet.

> I am switching away from the middleware because someone here told me that this was the preferred way to initialize GraphQL, mainly because it will require less work when...

See #3882 @julienFlexsoft . For example, if in the future we decide to make the handler be an `IUnhandledExceptionHandler` interface instead of a delegate, the `UnhandledExceptionDelegate` option would change within...

@joemcbride I'm adjusting (typically doubling) the bounty amounts due to lack of participation. Typically that's $20 -> $40 for documentation issues or $50 -> $100 for the sample project issues.

A simpler alternative here might just be to have the analyzer: 1. Locate graph input fields on CLR types, either by matching by name or lambda 2. If they (a)...

Well, it shouldn't need to consider any auto-generated properties for 'CanNotMatchInputFieldToTheSourceField' or 'CanNotSetSourceField' diagnostics because the auto-registering type will not add any properties that do not match the requirements. For...

> What may be the reason for defining additional fields in the constructor? All the legal properties and fields on the source type will be added automatically. So, how will...