Sebastian Zartner

> Overall `border-image` is a mess, and most authors won't touch it with a bargepole unless they really have to I wouldn't go that far and say that it's a...

Btw. regarding the state of the `fit-content` keyword vs. the `fit-content()` function, I just filed https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10601. Sebastian

> @SebastianZ It makes sense to add separate tests to flex properties to help users more visually see how they are supported in different properties. I'm still not totally happy...

> > Not many people get involved in the shape() discussion on the calls anyway. > > I think that'll depend somewhat on who you get involved (e.g. @LeaVerou cares...

With [CSS Linked Parameters](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-link-params-1/) there is already an approach to pass parameters to an SVG or other external resources. It [provides three ways](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-link-params-1/#setting) to style SVGs via specific parameters. Sebastian

@brandonmcconnell I actually also like your approach, just wanted to outline that there is already something targetting the SVG styling issues we currently have. You outlined the differences quite well....

@Crissov Note that background-image can take a list of images, so `::background` would have to use a function notation. Having said that, this _would_ allow to "pierce into" the contents...

I am not sure if we should test _all_ of the pseudo-classes. Normally the tests only cover a few combinations. Though I don't have a strong opinion on that. Regarding...

> Regarding `:xr-overlay`, I realized we don't have any tests for WebXR yet. I guess we should add them as well. Created https://github.com/LeaVerou/css3test/pull/257 for that. Sebastian

Again an extremely long delay. Sorry for letting you wait, @yisibl! 😞 And thank you for your work on this! Sebastian