`{3rd: "Beedell", 1st: "Roke"}`{.JSON5}

Results 466 comments of `{3rd: "Beedell", 1st: "Roke"}`{.JSON5}

> http://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1877#issuecomment-516060581. Currently, for Rawhide of Fedora Silverblue, Firefox and GNOME Connections are installed as RPM packages, although they are both operational perfectly as Flatpak packages. Therefore, I may want...

[This problem](http://github.com/etesync/android/issues/189) has been occurring for [me](http://github.com/BEEDELLROKEJULIANLOCKHART) since 2021-09-15 or 2021-09-16: > --- BEGIN DEBUG INFO --- > SYNCHRONIZATION INFO > Synchronization phase: syncronizing journals > Account name: BEEDELLROKEJULIANLOCKHART >...

> http://github.com/etesync/android/issues/189#issuecomment-921842471. This error is not occurring for me anymore, but [I am not able to synchronise with tasks.org](http://github.com/tasks/tasks/issues/1495), which may be relevant.

For me, reinstallation and subsequent reconfiguration of EteSync and Tasks.org did cause synchronisation to become operational.

This is very different to mine: it did not display any notification of errata.

Because Android 12 shall handle visual customisation very differently to its predecessors, now is when you should rewrite the interface of EteSync to support features such as dark mode.

> http://github.com/etesync/android/issues/144#issuecomment-916435925. @tasn, interfaces that shall be designed for Android 12 shall use new methodology for interface-design. The implementation of this methodology is being referred to collectively as [Material You](http://material.io/blog/announcing-material-you)....

> http://github.com/etesync/android/issues/144#issuecomment-949506970. @tasn, the interface of EteSync should not be very complicated because most operation is handled by its web-technology-based counterpart. Consequently, this may be the perfect opportunity to support...

Has the improvement been submitted to http://f-droid.org ?

http://github.com/microsoft/calculator/issues/893#issuecomment-900144776, I am believing that most modern software is utilising both the [Universal Windows Platform](http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Windows_Platform), and [WinUI](http://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml); the latter being for their interfaces. Therefore, surely that is irrelevant, as migration...