Olaoluwa Osuntokun
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
I guess the argument is that this may end up with less splits total in the end?
!lightninglabs-deploy mute
This PR in `btcwallet` may resolve this issue: https://github.com/btcsuite/btcwallet/pull/807
Our behavior is based on this fragment: > if the receiving peer specified by the onion is NOT known: > return an unknown_next_peer error. So IMO the wording can be...
You can't have a value of 0 for the CLTV delta. If you did, then you'd be exposed to losing funds on each HTLC you forward, as a race condition...
That's the default value for the _cli_, not `lnd` default values. You can see the default values for those fields at `lnd -h`: ``` --bitcoin.minhtlc= The smallest HTLC we are...
You don't need to set a value, if you aren't actually modifying it.
Thanks to @ellemouton for making the change to the btcd's `mempool` package to export the func used here.
This is a very simple approach that just ensures we won't broadcast these transactions. Ideally we should add this check before this step even, in areas like the funding manager...
> lready handles removing the failed tx from TxStore, what's the effect of adding CheckTransactionStandard from the caller's view? That's a good question: AFAICT, something is happening where even though...