Olaoluwa Osuntokun
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
> This looks straightforward, I'd like to try to do it if no one is working on it. Note that this PR will span 3 repos (including `neutrino`). > If...
Are you able to reproduce the same thing w/ simnet? IIRC, I think btcd will do difficulty retargets for regtest, while bitcoind never does. This is what historically led to...
We have a gRPC server for neutrino in version 0.15 of lnd, which IMO should actually be moved to _this_ project, which'll allow us to easily add calls like this.
Seems related to https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/5230? It's fixed in 0.13 which should be released this week.
A temp channel failure is sent as well (already): https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/htlcswitch/interceptable_switch.go#L150 I think this might be related to the fact that we won't apply a channel update when it comes from...
Woah...looks super cool!
Approach looks sound if you still want to pick this up. Atm, it's implemented more as an "all or nothing". I think this is also related to https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/4016
I think this is a sane change, but it _does_ end up breaking the API for all callers. As an intermediate step, we could _just_ remove the internal field? Or...
Atm it only works for a single `lnd` node. To support multiple nodes, we'll need to add a new label for a node ID, and that's about it. [This attribute](https://github.com/lightninglabs/lndmon/blob/master/config.go#L26)...
This is you attempting to hit the `/metrics` endpoint on `lnd`?