Romano Giannetti
Romano Giannetti
I'll try to see if I can find some. We use here quite extensively, but being my field electronics, not electricity, I tend not to use that notation... If I...
I checked with an electric engineering / EMC expert here, and he sent me this (here the unit is `p.u.` which is a bit a no-unit..). He told me that...
This is better   (Power System Analysis, by Hadi Saadat)
It could be a good idea --- especially if the command could have the phase-number as a parameter, so that one can switch from, say "I = 30 ∠π/6 mA"...
Yay, thanks! @josephwright
Probably plenty of text labels of this kind are broken around `circuitikz`. I'll see if I can find more. Notice that this is *not* a problem if you do not...
Well --- about the legacy transistor text, as you can see, the text itself is badly placed. That was a switch for old circuits, I think it can be ignored...
To explain myself better: I supposed that `legacy transistors text` (at least) and maybe also `component text/left` should be style, global options for the package. In that case, there is...
Hmm, it seems that the manual accepts the local usage. Ok, I'll fix it. I have little time now, but I hope to push forward this PR on the weekend
Can you check this change? The only problem is that, if this is true, it has to be applied basically to _every_ shape in circuitikz, which will be a long...