Romano Giannetti
Romano Giannetti
Nice @hmenke, thank you. One little thing: I was trying to provide the fill with no argument for `circuitikz` now, and I was thinking something like checking for the version...
Thanks @muzimuzhi ! I had managed to arrive at `\pgfkeyssetvalue{/pgf/arrow keys/fill/.@def}{}%` --- is that equivalent? It seems to work, and should work also for older formats without `expl3`...
Also, I think that `\expandafter\let\csname pgfk@/pgf/arrow keys/fill/.@def\endcsname\@undefined` is doing the same thing as the `\cs_undefine:c`; am I correct?
@muzimuzhi Thanks - I suppose that the code in your last answer needs LaTeX, am I right? I mean, it would not work in ConTeXt for example...
Thanks @muzimuzhi. Unfortunately, I found that the format of the date changed between 2021 and 2022 --- it was separated by `/` before... :-(
Maybe I could just check if `/pgf/arrow keys/fill/.@def` is defined, and if yes, apply the change. Or surrender and just add the `filled` key and be done...
@Skillmon thanks again. I was not sure about the `\unexpanded` thing and grouping there, but it seems that it works ok: https://github.com/circuitikz/circuitikz/blob/5537c8f2420f43e49fb23887e8d417b96e4313bd/tex/pgfcirc.defines.tex#L269-L319
Hm... I do not know if that one is really needed. Those are typically one-shot components, in the sense that you have an off-one in a circuit, so it can...
@jmonclard any comment here? Thanks!
I will close this for now --- please feel free to reopen if you think it is not answered!