Davide Punzo
Davide Punzo
> @Punzo thanks for the quick fix! Can you maybe give a brief summary what was the underlying issue? just an error in the parsing code, the second SR was...
> I also noticed that in `/platform/viewer/public/config/default.js`, v9 is referenced. Could it be changed to v10? sure! done! > Here is a [dropbox link](https://www.dropbox.com/s/9hmurxp0p908h3v/OHIF_two_SR_annotation_issue_08_24_22.zip?dl=0) the with the 2 SRs and...
@deepakri201 for me both datasets are working: 1)  2)  However, In your screenshot I see a study with a segmentation and two...
Hi, the tolerance as described in https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/issues/2656#issuecomment-1014682438 is indeed 0.01. I will double check asap if it's indeed a tolerance issue.
@ccosmin97 can you kindly provide also the MRI, please? the studyID will be enough, thanks!
Ah just seen that you already provided everything here https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vq3oe7f2fwl5p4r/AACNbGeKfkOQSEpzEXC3OlUua?dl=0
found the issue here: https://github.com/dcmjs-org/dcmjs/blob/master/src/utilities/orientation/nearlyEqual.js#L24 this condition was too strict (Number.EPSILON is around 10^-16). This means in the case of comparing two numbers close to zero (e.g., around 10^-[11:13]), these...
@ccosmin97 please note that if you are in OHIF version 4.12.41 (however this version did not hit yet the IDC production portal, you can check the version in the Debug...
@GitanjaliChhetri
> @GitanjaliChhetri Can you detect the situation that leads to the issue with the sliceNormal? It sounds like the problem is that the vectors are parallel leading to a degenerate...