Pieter-Jan Briers
Pieter-Jan Briers
> As I've mentioned before, I'm pretty new to C#, but a cursory look at [the happy eyeballs implementation in robust toolbox](https://github.com/space-wizards/RobustToolbox/blob/master/Robust.Shared/Network/HappyEyeballsHttp.cs#L42) tells me I should be able to do...
So... what's the point of this?
Closing given lack of response.
So I don't mind having this as a feature (assuming you change the API so the request takes a proper cancellation opportunity), but this PR isn't necessary to implement your...
Aesthetically I definitely prefer having the separators between columns. Also the "go to servers tab" button being full-width is weird.
You can't a server info entry after opening it. Also removal of the arrow indicating it's expandable is bad UX.
This should not be a black list for fuck's sake. The whole problem with the original PR was that we "can't foresee what might break in the future".
> If you are adding a new species you have hopefully tested it with Nukies (and thus added it to the blacklist if necessary). Literally the whole reason there is...
Ok wait I'm taking a look at this and the reason this is broken is different than I thought.
So this is fucking stupid. The solution *is* in fact configured to use the correct configuration when building for Tools:  The problem is that compiling the project directly with...