Ovid
I'm also getting this issue, Is anyone working on it? I see that https://github.com/twintproject/twint/pull/1255 fixes the issue, but at the cost of silently ignoring the error. I might add that...
I would also like to see this added. This is what happens when I share a link on Facebook now: You can test that your metadata is correct via [the...
In theory that's it, but as far as I can tell, the feature is documented by not implemented. See also: https://github.com/PerlDancer/Dancer2/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=strict_config
@jonathanKingston: The approach has been suggested before and always shot down. The problem with this approach is that it is not backwards-compatible. Maintaining this backwards compatibility is a key design...
@jonathanKingston: I know this must be frustrating for you and I'm sorry about that. We're very, very cautious about this because TAP is the default test protocol used in the...
@exodist has offered pretty much the first syntax I've seen which does _not_ break backwards-compatibility, but it has some issues (which I'll cover in the moment). Many suggested alternatives break...
A point release will also break things. The [Test::Harness::Grammar](https://metacpan.org/source/LEONT/Test-Harness-3.35/lib/TAP/Parser/Grammar.pm) considers version numbers to be integers. [This email thread has some of the historical discussion on that](http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap/current/msg00411.html), Also note that Schwern...
Note: the top-level ticket says "edited by Ovid". I accidentally clicked a checkbox. I unchecked it after I saw what I had done. I did not change the ticket. Sorry...
Why would we need `construct_object`? Is this for freezing/thawing? Also, the `get_field` and `set_field` would be part of of a MOP, right? If so, and if your proposed functions were...