Okon Samuel

> Or are you saying we could safely implement the workaround (under the hood - the user doesn't need to do anything) Yes. With the only caveat being we won't...

@ablaom. You may not like this. But i would suggest disabling the option of nesting `CPUProcesses` in `CPUThreads` until this `finalizer` issue is sorted out by julia. reason being the...

@juliohm I am not sure if there are people using different conventions apart from the `DefaultConvention`. My thought is that users may not like the `DefaultConvention` used in `ScientificTypes.jl` and...

I have also been thinking down this line and I like this idea. It makes the codebase simpler.

So I guess this would imply that `scitype(Any[1,2,3])` should return `Array{Unknown, 1}` since `Scitype` would operate on the type information. This is would be more efficient than the current implementation...

@tlienart shouldn't this be edited since you've add docstrings for MultivariateStats models

@gd1989 could you clarify please??

@tlienart I'd love to add a QDA model implementation . But https://github.com/trthatcher/DiscriminantAnalysis.jl package seems old (especially julia syntax and standard libraries used) and might not be be compatible with julia...

> Hey, any updates on this topic? I may start working on a PR if there has not been any advances yet - taking sklearn as a template. Feel free...

@ablaom a review would be appreciated.