NFSL2001

Actually, just noticed that the style of G (今) series is not mentioned anywhere in Taiwan MOE style (at least on documents available online), it only exist in fonts similar...

@tamcy just to check, you have marked B6 as done ([❶ B6](https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-han-serif/issues/121#user-content-heading-b6)), but there is no mention of it in the README.pdf or updates in the font file. (@punchcutter please...

P/S: 𪊶 for TW seems to be wrong too. 

@zhenlige This is the form specified in 《通用规范汉字表》(2013).    If this is not to be considered, then issue #300 should be addressed too as 辶 is not specified...

Update: the newest GB18030-2022 has changed the form of 廷 series to use the glyph with middle stroke longer. 

P/S: If this is to be viewed as a regional difference, then the requirement of two dots in 立 and 豆 to be connected to the top and bottom stroke...

It should be noted that which glyphs have their feet removed are pretty inconsistent:  Also, 简 (U+7B80) was changed from v1.004 to v2.004, which IMO actually looks worse: 

I would believe Adobe have a record for which glyphs are removed and which glyphs are added (mostly HK) across 2.0 since such a big update should have a record...

 @punchcutter Inconsistent record in Readme file compared to here.

问题：据justfont宣传，西文Varela Round也是从Google Fonts找出来的（[这里](https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Varela+Round)），虽然有RFN但是还是上得了Google Fonts。这情况可以参考吗？