Nathan Molinier
Nathan Molinier
> ⚠️ **A more recent and actively-maintained version of this code is available in [spinalcordtoolbox/disc-labeling-hourglass](https://github.com/spinalcordtoolbox/disc-labeling-hourglass)**
[SPINEPS](https://github.com/Hendrik-code/spineps) seems to be a very interested method to improve our vertebral labeling on T2w images. | sub-BB277 | sub-DC293 | sub-DEV148Sujet01 | sub-MC224 | |:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| | the repository to: - simplify the CLI to really simple inputs: - "--path-in": corresponding to the niftii image path -...
> So, is the idea that only the "label extraction" function is the new part, and the rest of `simple_run.py` is just for convenience/testing? Yes indeed ! The purpose of...
I will have to check for sct_deepseg_sc and sct_label_vertebrae to be fair in the comparison of the methods.
> code like [this one](https://github.com/sct-pipeline/contrast-agnostic-softseg-spinalcord/blob/32ef5c9d541bb779453cca6fc8c25b768bc2c9b1/monai/run_inference_single_image_v2.py#L89) is supposed to take care of this, no? Yes it is indeed the case, however I don't know if nnUNet is performing any reorientations beforehand....
I did not implement any model yet to SCT, but aren't we calling model specific inference scripts when calling the models ?
I got this same problem with most of the subjects from the dataset `whole-spine`. I will send you an example using our slack !
> Hold on with merging. > > According to [this comment](https://github.com/neuropoly/data-management/issues/300#issuecomment-1948731433), `desc-rater` should NOT go at the end as currently done in this PR: Yes indeed, doing this will help...