Niels Dekker

I think this issue should have been fixed by: - pull request https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/pull/949 commit https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/commit/601f4656e912cc1388fbfa4509d531b7ea5c302f Could it be that that PR is not yet included with your ITKElastix version?

PR https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/pull/949 was merged to SuperElastix/elastix/main on August 22. While itk-elastix-0.18.0 was released before, on August 17: https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKElastix/releases/tag/v0.18.0 I think the elastix PR still has to be included with ITKElastix....

If `elastix_transform_parameters` contains multiple maps, my initial guess is: - Use the plural version, `WriteParameterFiles`, rather than the singular version, `WriteParameterFile` - Specify a file name for each output file...

Your approach sounds right to me as well. Indeed, it is sufficient to just specify the final transform parameter file to transformix (Bspline2, in your case), it will then find...

Thanks for reporting. @tbirdso `itk::ElastixLogLevel` is a strongly typed enum, defined here: https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/blob/5f0940d2ec5498a6bc98f53c3eaa6a0a1ccd74b3/Core/Main/itkElastixLogLevel.h SWIG _does_ support strongly typed enumerations: https://www.swig.org/Doc3.0/CPlusPlus11.html#CPlusPlus11_strongly_typed_enumerations So it _should_ be fine, I'm not sure how to...

@thewtex > Reference: https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/tree/develop/Testing/Data/Translation(1%2C-2) Explanation: The current "develop" branch of elastix supports elastix transform parameter files that link to an ITK generated HDF5 or TFM file. For example, this is...

BTW Elastix (develop branch) also has an experimental option to produce an ITK format TFM or a HDF5 file, as added by https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/pull/358

@blowekamp It took a while, but I think I addressed all of those (2000+) warnings, with elastix pull request https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/pull/1136 commit https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix/commit/78fe482aaabac5cb42b19c9365718b80eea1833e, now at the main branch of https://github.com/SuperElastix/elastix Thanks...

@blowekamp Can you possibly give it another try, using the latest revision from the SuperElastix/elastix main branch? I'm not sure, but it _might_ help that we have recently removed the...

@blowekamp Thanks Bradley. I see, macos and windows build fine now, but those self-hosted Ninja builds still fail. Is that still a show-stopper?