John

It's on the way, and you're helping us out a ton!! :)

Hello! I was browsing GitHub, and came across this issue after curiously searching up "Grailsort". I know this issue hasn't been updated in a little bit, but I still thought...

Brilliant! > good! although why replace an existing visualizer instead of adding a new one? "Hoops" is inefficient and extremely eye-straining.

Thank you so much!! I'll be looking over this for the next few weeks and manually merge your changes. Lemme know if you have any questions. Cheers!

Good idea! Will be doing in the future.

Any error messages showing up? What was the program doing when your screensaver would come on, causing it to crash?

This may be a result of the old graphics code? This bug report is gonna take some time to solve.

I would prefer a separate "optimized" version, yeah! Remember that we're going to better organize the sort/shuffle/distribution lists later on to cut down on the clutter!

O(3) is actually the same as O(1)! That means "constant time", or "this algorithm will take the same amount of steps no matter how large the array". However, no sorting...

Ah yes, this issue. I've encountered it myself before. Will look further into it later now.