Mike Stall
Mike Stall
Functions can have overloads for scalar and tables. We often implement the scalar overload first and the tabular overload separately.
@mortenostigard - which product are you using?
Break this out into individual issues?
Yes, we definitely want this. We're close to having this functionality in Dv.Eval .
needs: https://github.com/microsoft/Power-Fx-Dataverse/pull/390
fyi - methods for converting between Display and Logical names: https://github.com/microsoft/Power-Fx/blob/c70286e724de26c535e2c44386d59340f9b8d6f6/src/libraries/Microsoft.PowerFx.Core/Public/Engine.cs#L498C23-L498C45 Persist in invariant form. Edit in display name.
This looks good to me. My top concern is complexity - but this keeps it simple.
This comment did not age well ;) --- In reply to: [2191048923](https://github.com/microsoft/Power-Fx/pull/2504#issuecomment-2191048923) [](http://example.com/codeflow?ancestors=2191048923)
See #908, #548 #Closed
#2190 seems to do some work on this.