MattWiener

I am not against this idea, and specifying the total time and cycle length sounds good. But handling discounting does not need to be so verbose. The way I've been...

There has already been some work along these lines - I have a plotting function for "surv.object". This also relates to #274 . You can see some of the changes...

I think we already have the tools to do this. tabular_input.R uses one method, which is to load things into and pass around an environment. That's what's being done for...

Hi, Jordan. Sorry for the slow response. On point #1. Progression free survival, as a form of survival, just can't be greater than overall survival, and I still think it...

This was actually (partially) addressed in a recent update. Sped up the do_() call in eval_matrix by around 4x. Of course there is always more to do. It might be...

partially addressed by pull request #140.

I think I have the discount issue taken care of, though it will be good to have another set of eyes on it. If you open a branch for it,...

Jordan - I think the ability to have arbitrary objects as parameters would be useful, particularly for the data set as you mention. Currently survival fits and partitioned survival objects...

Antoine - what kind of functions do you mean? I've got a couple of functions in the latest version (in convenience.R) that may be relevant. These include a function to...

find_least_cost_partition.R, already in the package. I should probably move it into convenience.R