Matthias Grob

@apocolipse Sounds good thanks! I will do that.

@anassinator I think offboard should produce log data compatible to other modes from the Firmware side. Offboard mode is currently under improvement. For better modularization of the different setpoint sources...

Could these values not get fed back to the general vehicle power which then is supported by flight review? Currently the general message does not support distinguishing motors but it...

That's true, summing up kills too much information. But a general ESC report topic for any ESCs that support feedback instead of one specialized to UAVCAN would still make sense....

Sounds very good, the only point I wanted to make is that it's not only CAN ESCs but also tap_esc and maybe others we don't know yet in the future....

Just an idea: Since it's to specifically test an unplanned error case it might be useful to not build the functionality of the error case of losing offboard setpoints into...

@hamishwillee Thanks for the explanation! ok, so the problem is valid and we need a clear documented distinction for how to transmit the commands that is hopefully not too complicated...

@DonLakeFlyer The command part of PX4 does this as well. Only for the mission items there's a distinction which doesn't cover all commands. But using the 10^7 exponent results in...

@julianoes I'm not sure anymore. Some SITL tests are failing on this pr even though I think they shouldn't. Does the command and hence the startup script fail in SITL?...

Maybe you were onto something with your original fix. But why would it only happen in the VTOL SITL CI tests and run real vehicles and quad SITL fine 🤔...