MalteDLuecken
MalteDLuecken
Tbh, I found out about `groups` after writing the function and looking for a way to put the dots in front. Maybe there is a simpler way to do this......
Damn... so smug that @VolkerBergen ;). This looks great! Although maybe a keyword that triggers this might be nice for the user.
I actually used `sc.pl.embedding_density()` for this in the end, as it works quite well for this use case as well.
Yes, exactly :). I would have a default that turns it to random. I don't think it should be too hard either. However, this will probably break a few tests.
> Sounds good to me. How are you thinking of handling reproducibility w.r.t. random seeds? I was thinking of just setting the seed to 0 by default, which would be...
> What the fair way to color this? If it were random, or purely by count this would look mostly like A. I would argue that this would be fair....
Thanks for the heads up for the typo. That is fixed now. About the feature request... this is not entirely straightforward. The challenges to do this are: 1. As densities...
I'm enjoying this brainstorming session... let's continue. I think the most difficult part would be the grid plotting in the end, but let's continue with the points in order. 1....
1. You could create a heuristic grid size depending on cell numbers, or it's probably easier to just put grid dimensions as a user parameter with some (low) default value....
Looks super cool... but also like a heavy dependency. Do you think it would be worth using datashader when we are just looking for a simple additional function?