Kristoffer Carlsson

``` julia> using JuliaInterpreter, BracedErrors julia> bracederror(2.34567e70, 3.46e69) == @interpret bracederror(2.34567e70, 3.46e69) false ``` Maybe some fast math stuff? Edit: Bisected to #55802 Minimized to ``` julia> 10.0^68 # PR...

@nanosoldier `runtests(["BracedErrors", "JuliaSyntaxHighlighting", "Cosmology", "NeighbourLists", "QSFit", "SwitchOnSafety", "IncompressibleNavierStokes"])`

@nanosoldier `runtests()`

Okay, let's run another PkgEval and then not merge too much in here so we can fix the possible regressions and get this out. @nanosoldier `runtests()`

I think the latest backport should fix Revise

@nanosoldier `runtests(["JuliaSyntaxHighlighting", "JuliaInterpreter", "LogDensityProblemsAD", "Revise", "FromFile", "Handcalcs", "CharacteristicInvFourier", "BenchmarkProfiles", "AxisKeysExtra", "RegressionTables", "ExtendableGrids", "MCVI", "StipplePlotly", "StipplePlotlyExport", "NonconvexMultistart", "PlutoPages", "ParticleInCell", "DistributedFactorGraphs", "WaveSpec", "FrequencySweep", "SpiDy"])`

Doesn't look like it, the PR that fixes it seems quite big to backport...

> Unless you're talking about the general-released package, which indeed needs me to backport the changes to a new release. Yes.

@nanosoldier `runtests()`

@nanosoldier `runtests(["JuliaInterpreter", "KissMCMC", "ParallelStencil", "BenchmarkProfiles", "SmoQyHankelCorrCleaner", "Boscia", "ReducedComplexityModeling", "GMT", "FSimBase", "RealTimeAudioDiffEq", "SurfaceReactions", "JointSurvivalModels", "ControlBarrierFunctions", "GeophysicalModelGenerator", "ReactionSensitivity", "HarmonicBalance"])`