Leo Kirchner
Leo Kirchner
Surely at some point, yes. Definitely a good idea.
Hey @Phill93 and thanks for the PR! Please - add a change log fragment (see first failing CI) - add a unit test that asserts this behaviour keeps working in...
Slightly related: In #5245 I hit similar errors during my explorations. I don't have an answer to the problem though, but I do want to challenge the statement: > In...
Related: https://github.com/nautobot/nautobot-app-ssot/issues/632 Since `nautobot_ssot.contrib` is used here, I would appreciate an implementation upstream right in SSoT so other projects can leverage it, too.
Thanks for submitting! > nautobot-ssot version: How can I get that? probably 2.6.1 Apps -> Installed Apps in 2.x Feel free to submit a fix for this!
Should be a straight-forward fix, to check if the job result exists here: ``` File "/opt/nautobot/.local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/nautobot_ssot/models.py", line 137, in get_source_url kwargs={"class_path": self.job_result.job_model.class_path}, ```
@dylanbob > nautobot-ssot version: How can I get that? probably 2.6.1 Under Apps -> Installed Apps or with `pip show` As for the actual issue, we have found that we...
Yeah primarily for me its about having the logging context available.
Do check out the [next-2.0] branch - Pydantic 2.0 is already in 🎉 https://github.com/networktocode/diffsync/compare/develop...next-2.0
FYI: We will merge #114 before cutting the release but the other changes will be postponed in favor of getting Pydantic 2.0 support out there sooner rather than later.