Jonatan Antoni

Would you mind raising a PR with your proposed changes? Perhaps switch over to ARM-software/CMSIS_6 and we leave it unchanged here. Adding `ARM_` prefix might be a good idea but...

Hi @benjarobin, thanks for pointing this out. We are in the process of moving to CMSIS 6. Once the new major repo is public, we need to address it there.

Hi @fstop22, Please note that CMSIS-DSP development has moved off to [ARM-software/CMSIS-DSP](https://github.com/ARM-software/CMSIS-DSP). Cheers, Jonatan

Hi @henrla, There should be no difference in exposure to undefined behaviour when using low-level instructions within a block of C/C++ code. My reading of the advice is to not...

Hi @henrla, They are basically intended to be used in C/C++ code. But if the overall code gives the expected behaviour goes far beyond CMSIS visibility. Hence, it's totally up...

Hi @henrla, Sure, we can add the links you provided earlier into the documentation. I guess, you'd need to inspect the disassembly to know if the compiler inserted additional load/store...

Searching for `ITM_TCR_TraceBusID_Pos` points out this inconsistency affects Cortex-M3, -M4, and -M7. And not only TraceBusID, but other macros as well. I think (except the suffixes `_Pos` and `_Msk`) we...

Hi @Masmiseim36, We repeatedly think about refactoring the layout but typically we end up that this is not worth the effort. The benefit seems to be small but there is...

@Masmiseim36, the problem is right in the first line. It's not a Python issue even if the thrown exception is not properly handled. The issue is here: ``` [GCC][Cortex-M3][low](build:cbuild) Command...

Please note that CMSIS-SVD spec has moved to https://github.com/Open-CMSIS-Pack/svd-spec.