Jonatan Antoni

Hi @tobermory, Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, you are right, the given code example is not thread safe. Another limitation is that it relies some code calling `GetTick()` at...

Hi @apullin, I'd like to point you to the new locations: - [CMSIS 6](https://github.com/ARM-software/CMSIS_6) - [RTX5](https://github.com/ARM-software/CMSIS-RTX) - [RTOS2 Validation](https://github.com/ARM-software/CMSIS-RTOS2_Validation) In fact, RTOS2 does not cover byte pools because these have...

> There are plenty of ways to mitigate issues with byte pools, and they are still used extensively with the understood limitations. Of course, if you use them with care....

> Yes, I can see those functions. But that is an RTX implementation. Yes, this is RTX implementation. Would it be sufficient if we would level up todays RTX API...

Thanks for sharing your opinion. We need to think this carefully. Please mind CMSIS 5 is not under active development any longer. Instead, we can think about adding such a...

Hi @DanielMtzNXP, Thanks for pointing this out. This is not directly related with CMSIS but with the implementation of CMSIS-Driver APIs for your i.MXRT1064 device. @RobertRostohar, can you work with...

Gents, If I am reading this correctly, the breaking change got introduced into fsl_enet driver between versions 2.5.4 and 2.7.0. According to semantic versioning, incrementing the minor part of the...

> [..] XSD does not allow us to specify the relationship [..] No, not directly. What might work is grouping elements into exclusive groups. But that easily creates new issues/drawbacks....

Thanks for fixing this. Please not that development has been stalled here and moved to https://github.com/ARM-software/CMSIS_6 instead.

Hi @carlosperate, Thanks for pointing this out. We are working on getting Core-M and -A better aligned in CMSIS 6 under https://github.com/ARM-software/CMSIS_6.