Joel Speed
Joel Speed
@sanchezl Is this PR still needed?
/close Please reopen if you feel we still need this
Changes LGTM, how do we know this is safe? Can you please explain in the PR description what has been done in 4.18 that makes this a safe change in...
> Also, we would make the 4.18.z cluster containing this change as a minimum cluster before upgrading to 4.19. Which change do you mean? Is there something in 4.18 that...
> The change still needs to be added Do this first. Once you have that logic in 4.18.z and set the minimum upgrade version in the upgrade graph, I'm happy...
/lgtm /override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema The enum removal is safe as we have an upgrade block that prevents upgrades into this version of the API, implemented per https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2181#issuecomment-2741027104
I've been looking into this a little and concluded that resolving this should be relatively straight forward, at least, on the providers side. Looking at AWS as an example. The...
Thanks @pothos, based on that, I think we should make sure we move back to the upstream coreos repo to import the types rather than using the forks, thanks for...
Just a note, I think since I last commented here we added ignition 3.x support to CAPA. We are not users of the KubeADM provider but may be able to...
@jcpowermac How many components are left that are depending on these APIs that you're aware of?